About The Author


My first introduction to an industrial network occurred in 1984, when I worked as a trainee for a company called Positronika. They had developed their own network called TechLan, for connecting PDP-11 systems together. Note that this was at a time when PC's were modest (4.77 Mhz...) and Ethernet barely existing.

Positronika had quite a tough job explaining what a network was and especially what to use it for. A few years later they quit the industrial network market; they no longer exist. It was a good product, only 10 years too early.

1986 In the mean time, I got my degree in Computer Science (with specialisation in datacommunications), and went to work for Philips IAS, in the area of VMEbus, Unix, and real-time kernels. This didn't have anything to do with industrial networks, until a moment in 1990, when Philips decided they were going to make the controller chip for the ISA SP50 fieldbus, a project team was formed, and I was assigned to write all the software. With collegues, we visited all sorts of conferences in exotic places, but before we even got started Philips decided to quit. Somebody apparently noticed that the ISA SP50 work didn't move along that fast...

Again I got assigned to doing real-time kernel work, and ported the Motorola VME-Exec kernel and the associated development system to HP-UX. This project was also cancelled after a year. A project with X.25 was then done, but since all software was bought, it was not much fun. In the mean time, the department I worked for was merged with another department developing PLC's. Because of my network experience, I was assigned to develop the datacommunications boards for this PLC.

1994 We started off with a proprietary protocol called PPCCOM. Additionally, we had been tracking Profibus developments in Germany for more then a year, did courses (and my German improved quite a lot!) and had bought a starterkit from Softing to play with. A major event in technical automation every year in Germany is the well-known Hannover Messe, and marketing suits decided we ought to have a Profibus-controller. The Messe was in April, so we had three months to develop the hardware, implement the protocol, interface it to the PLC, and get it to communicate with something.

We contacted a Karlsruhe-based company called I-Tec, one of the inventors of Profibus (Prof. Bender).  For a more $40000 we bought the source of the protocolstack for a 8051, but we got the schematics of the hardware for free, and set to work. When the PCB's arrived after a week, we compiled the code, put it in an EPROM, inserted it into a socket, powered the board up, and .... it didn't work. After a some debugging, we found two errors on the PCB. After fixing, we got the board up-and-running by initialising it manually. So i still had one month to go to implement the PLC-interface and build a demo. Luckily it all worked out and two PLC's happily communicated with each other and an Omron slave during the Messe.

1995 With the Profibus-controller now on the market, we expected sales to skyrocket. Unfortunately that didn't happen, even though many customer stressed that "You must follow open protocols otherwise we don't buy". Almost nobody in the Netherlands knew what Profibus was, how to work with it, where to get documentation, how to troubleshoot, etc. This made we start writing articles for magazines explaining the technology.

Several other companies decided to form a Dutch User's Group, with Philips as chair. It organised the first-ever Profibus seminar in this country, and an attendance of at most 50 people was expected. To everybody's surprise, more than 300 people wanted to attend, so we divided them over two days.

Next year, the user's group decided to build a large demo-network on a major Dutch fair. The evening before we all went to Siemens to install the hardware and get the agreed demo's up-and-running. The collected Profibus "experts" of a whole country were unable to get it working. So we split the single network in three segments, and I got my demo up in half an hour. I left for home, and heard later that those companies who stressed that Profibus is a piece-of-cake, had to work until deep into the night and then still didn't get it to work.

In the mean time, I had been busy developing boards for other networks as well. A Modbus / JBus board was made, a CAN-board with the SeleCAN protocol for a remote I/O system, an Ethernet-interface for downloading and debugging programs in the PLC, a network for fast mirroring of data in eight PLC's, a CAN-board with a redundant network interface, a CAN-board for controlling 400A power-supplies, an AS-Interface gateway, a Bitbus-board, a Profibus/DP board,  and a CAN-board with a proprietary protocol for controlling drives.

We had developed IEC 61131/5-style functionblocks as API for the user's program, years before anyone heard of NOAH and VIGO and DCOM. Unfortunately nobody seemed to understand the concept of network-independent interfaces, and the IEC 61131/5 died silently.

1996 Because of the lack of knowledge in this country about industrial networks, I had started in 1993 with writing articles for Dutch magazines about all aspects of their use, implementation, benefits, equipment, installation, etc. With a collegue I also wrote teaching material for a technical college. In 1996 there was so much material available for a book that finding a publisher was simple. The book was ready in december 1996, and since this is only a small country it has remained the only book about this subject.

In the course of 1997, I left IAS for greener pastures. Industrial networks were just getting known in the Netherlands, and there was an enormous lack of knowledge, I decided to develop a course about the basics of industrial networks. In cooperation with the Mikrocentrum Eindhoven, I offer this course 4 times a year. In 1998 we also developed a Profibus course, and in 2000 we added an industrial Ethernet course, with plans for more!

Since I don't work for a vendor, there is no commercial interest in promoting this or that system more than other systems. The advantage of being non-aligned is that you can tell the facts, and don't have to worry about sales. For over three years in a row, time spent in giving courses had doubled each year. In addition I continue writing for magazines (such as "Aandrijftechniek", "Automatie", "Bits & Chips", and "Automatie"). And, of course, keeping the Fieldbus Reference List up-to-date.

And this is all in spare time ...  my normal job is in the R&D department of a machinebuilder in the Eindhoven area of the Netherlands.

 

Date: 9-Sep-2005